Feed aggregator

CN and Congebec, a Canadian logistics provider of distribution services for the food, retail and packaged goods industries, are collaborating on a “state-of-the-art” cold storage facility at CN’s Calgary Logistics Park in Alberta.

“Strategically located within CN’s integrated logistics hub, the facility will be designed to be in better proximity, accelerating the conversion of temperature-sensitive goods between rail and warehouse,” CN said. “Customers will benefit from a more reliable, timely and efficient service to get their perishable cargo to domestic and international markets. Developed with CN’s construction partner Matthews Tribal, the new Congebec facility will seamlessly integrate cold storage, cross-docking, transloading, and first- and last-mile services with CN’s established refrigerated programs. The proximity to rail of this new facility will also help streamline transfers, reduce dwell times, and ensure temperature-sensitive goods move more efficiently.”

“This innovative solution addresses long-standing challenges in the cold supply chain by enabling faster container flows, flexible on-demand capacity, and more reliable delivery schedules,” CN added. “This initiative will connect producers, retailers and logistics providers in Alberta and across the cold chain, reinforcing Canada’s food distribution network and global competitiveness. With this project, CN and Congebec are redefining cold chain logistics in Western Canada—giving customers greater speed, reliability, and confidence in moving their products across North America and into global markets.”

“This initiative with Congebec reflects CN’s commitment to building smarter, more sustainable supply chains, said CN Vice President, Intermodal Dan Bresolin. “This new hub will give our customers new options to move their temperature-sensitive products with greater efficiency, reliability, and reach, helping them compete in markets across North America and globally.”

“Working with CN on this new Calgary facility is a natural extension of our mission to provide reliable, sustainable cold chain solutions,” said Congebec Transport President Richard Patenaude. “By combining Congebec’s expertise in temperature-controlled logistics with CN’s expansive rail network, we’re giving customers the confidence to move their products anywhere they need to go, with efficiency and care.”

“We are proud to contribute our development expertise to a project that sets a new standard for cold chain logistics,” said Matthews Tribal Vice President, Development Carleigh Oude-Reimerink. “This facility represents the kind of genuine partnership Matthews Tribal believes in—built on trust and creating lasting value. By combining our Calgary presence with CN’s network and Congebec’s cold chain expertise, we’re helping customers overcome real challenges while supporting long-term growth in Western Canada.”

The post CN, Congebec Forge ‘Chilly’ Partnership appeared first on Railway Age.

The potential merger between Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern has stirred up lots of talk and speculation around its possible impact, from safety issues to job opportunities and other likely scenarios impacting the railroad industry. However, what a lot of folks are not discussing is the major disruption this merger will cause to local communities along its route, including one major city that’s played a central role in the nation’s connection of freight railroad–Chicago.

Throughout the course of my 54 years of experience in transportation and rail, including 37 years with CSX, I’ve witnessed or been directly involved in nine freight rail mergers, and the most common theme among each one can be summed up in one word: disruption.

Merging railroads of this scale brings significant impact and complexity. On one hand, it can lead to long-term cost efficiencies for suppliers and manufacturers that rely on rail to transport goods across the country, and the short-term effects are often positive with job creation to support construction and integration efforts. On the other hand, the most lasting impact and disruption of these mass-scale mergers will be felt by the communities located along the expanded or newly built rail lines and tracks.

Increased traffic on some lines that will create congestion that is felt by local communities in the form of increased gate down times at crossings, noise impacts of additional horns where there are no quiet zones in place, locomotive noise impacts, and an increase in slowed or stopped trains at congested locations such as entrances to yards or at-grade crossings with other railroads. Not to mention the potential impacts to commuter and intercity passenger service that shares the tracks with the freight railroads of Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern.

In taking a close look at local communities along this rail network across the U.S., there’s a variety of factors that can impact residents and neighborhoods ranging from environmental damage, safety concerns, noise pollution, traffic congestion and disruption, as well as socioeconomic displacement. In working in Chicago during the CN acquisition of the EJ&E, the impact on communities such as Barrington or Lynwood, in Illinois, created traffic pattern changes that increased train traffic by up to 400%. These communities and others alike were able to secure some concessions from the railroad through the STB process that allowed them to construct rail grade separations, thereby easing some of the impacts on their communities.

One metropolitan area with numerous surrounding communities that will feel the effects and disruption the most from this merger is Chicago. This merger will mean even more trains passing through already one of the major transportation hubs in the Midwest. The merger has the potential to also cause further disruption to residents and commuters who are already waiting sometimes more than 10 minutes for a freight train to cross a track—despite Illinois law prohibiting the blocking of crossings for this amount of time. The influx of freight trains through Chicago has the potential to cause substantial delays in local commuters’ schedules and inconvenience their daily lives.

This combined merger will also interfere with commuter rail, leading to delays for passengers on Chicago’s Amtrak and Metra rail lines, even though by federal law Amtrak passenger trains must be given preference over freight trains.

One initiative that resulted from the multiple mergers in the 1990s and culminating with a record snowstorm in January 1999—the Chicago CREATE program—is a great example of how a public-private partnership worked to improve the way passengers and goods are transported via rail. In my experience working on the CREATE program, I learned firsthand from meetings with local communities what impact freight trains had on them. In this case, the Union Pacific Geneva Subdivision and the Norfolk Southern Chicago Line are both expected to see additional train traffic.

During my experience as the Director of the Chicago Transportation Coordination Office (CTCO) in Chicago from 2003-2008, an incident at any point in the Chicago terminal had an almost immediate effect on trains not only in Chicago but a domino effect on trains enroute to Chicago. While the merger may eliminate some interchanges between railroads in Chicago, it will create new interchanges and modify others, resulting in changes to every railroad operating plan in Chicago. In addition, shippers that today use a specific railroad or multiple railroads will look to improve their costs and transit times, which will create more disruption that will take months to sort out.

During the CSX/NS acquisition of Conrail in 1999, when I was the Director of Train Operations in Chicago for CSX, up until the actual date of the split, it was unknown which railroad any shipper was going to use, and many shifted multiple times afterwards to avoid what I termed at the time “rolling congestion” where shippers would transition to the less-congested railroad, only to find out that the shift impacted both railroads, and the level of congestion would ebb and flow for up to one year afterwards. While the UP+NS merger is different than when CSX and NS “carved” up Conrail, shippers still have the ability stick with their current options or look elsewhere.

Before this merger gains approval, municipalities in its path should start planning sooner rather than later. One way to do so is to commission a study to better understand how the extended, enhanced or new railroad line will impact its community. For example, a detailed operating and infrastructure study can show whether infrastructure that needs to be built, such as a bridge to allow trains to travel under or over major streets and highways to reduce the amount of impact to residents from a traffic perspective. At the same time, any crossing closures can assist in the development of a Quiet Zone, which would also improve the quality of life for a community. This type of knowledge will also help in negotiations with the rail giants to help potentially offset the infrastructure costs to the municipality.

What I’ve learned in my tenure working for some of the nation’s biggest freight rail companies, like CSX, and on projects with other Class I railroads including CN, CPKC, NS and UP, is that it typically gets significantly worse before it gets better for the communities involved. My best advice for municipality leadership is to act early, stay informed and advocate consistently for your community’s interests.

Earl Wacker is a Director in RINA North America’s Rail & Transit Practice and has been with the firm since 2020. He has been involved in the railroad industry in North America for more than 50 years. With 37 years’ experience at CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) and its predecessors, he worked in every aspect of the railroad business. In 2008, Wacker retired from CSXT and took a position at AECOM (URS), where he was responsible for all railroads in North and South America. He retired from AECOM in 2019 and formed his own company to consult with railroads and other entities on issues ranging from operating coordination, capital project management, rules compliance, etc.

The post A Tectonic Shift on the Tracks: The Disruptive Potential of a Union Pacific-Norfolk Southern Merger appeared first on Railway Age.

On Oct. 14, 2025, the 45th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 signing, the Association of American Railroads launched a new website, “Harley Explains,” hosted by a folksy, bearded, ponytailed, blue jeans-and-leather-jacket-clad animated character named—who else—Harley, who looks like he just hopped off his Harley Davidson at a railroad crossing. Named after the late Rep. Harley Orrin Staggers, for whom the Staggers Rail Act was named out of respect, this Harley doesn’t gesture with his hands very much, like the late Jim Florio, the Italian-descent New Jersey congressman who actually authored and near single-handedly managed the legislation, probably did.

“I’m here to help you know what’s going on in rail policy and to get an idea of how freight railroads work,” Harley says in a Western-brogue-free baritone reminiscent of Sam Elliott. “Think of me as your guide through the nuts and bolts of the industry, minus the jargon and the snooze (I hope he’s not referring to Railway Age). I’m a true rail guy and I get pretty jazzed (remember that expression?) about all this stuff. I’ll drop new videos regularly, so subscribe to AAR’s YouTube channel and check out their newsletter The Signal to stay in the loop.”

Cowboy hats off to the AAR for doing this. It’s a great idea, presenting rail “stuff” in a simple, easily digestible way, like pork and beans straight out of the can, heated just a tad on a campfire. John Q. Public—who last I heard don’t know nuthin’ ’bout railroads ’cept that when them bells start ringin’ and lights start flashin’ and them gates come down, is gonna be waitin’ a real long time for a real long train to pass—could use some learnin’ ’bout all the good things railroads do.

Come to think of it, most of them folk up on Capitol Hill could use some learning, ’specially since none were around when President Jimmy Carter signed Staggers into law.

But let’s be clear folks. Florio got it done, as Capitol Hill Contributing Editor Frank N. Wilner points out in his book, Railroads and Economic Regulation (An Insider’s Account): “Sensing strong opposition, Florio flashed remarkable political savvy, seizing on an announcement by House Interstate and Foreign Commerce Committee Chairperson Harley O. Staggers (D-W.Va.) that he (Staggers) would retire after 16 House terms. To attract additional votes for H.R. 7235—and cement Staggers’ support—Florio renamed the Rail Act of 1980 as the Staggers Rail Act, calling it ‘a fitting tribute [to Chairperson Staggers’] years of service and dedication to a sound rail transportation system in America.”

Wilner’s book also chronicles Staggers’ opposition to early economic deregulation, such as a railroad-sought “zone of rate freedom.” So, Harley Staggers was not a deregulator in any sense of the word. Jim Florio was the squeeze and the juice behind the Staggers Rail Act—which was bipartisan legislation, somethin’ we don’t hear too much about ’round these parts anymore.

But that’s OK. All water under the railroad trestle. What matters, AAR tells ya’ll, is that since Staggers, “rail rates are 44% lower than in 1981 (adjusted for inflation). Railroads have reinvested $840 billion—$1.4 trillion in today’s dollars—into their own networks. Railroads move one ton of freight nearly 500 miles on a single gallon of fuel, and make $23 billion each year in private investment, not taxpayer dollars. The legacy of the bipartisan partial economic deregulation continues to deliver results for railroads, customers and everyday consumers. Preserving this landmark legislation will help drive the investment necessary to continue enhancing safety and keep our economy growing. Bottom line: The Staggers Rail Act turned a failing industry into a global leader. [This] anniversary is a moment to reflect on the power of smart policy—and the importance of protecting it.”

Now, for railroaders, all them facts amount to making the obvious less obscure. But for political types and the public, well, heck, we need to keep hammerin’ away, drivin’ that spike into that crosstie—rather than into our own coffin.

The post ‘Harley’ Explains it All appeared first on Railway Age.

A wood trestle on the Oregon Coast Scenic Railroad was damaged by fire on October 8, and the cause of the blaze is still under investigation. 

The trestle, owned by the Port of Tillamook Bay and leased to OCSR along with the rest of the former Southern Pacific branchline along the Oregon Coast, is located near Tillamook. It is not used by OCSR’s regular excursions and is not expected to impact the tourist road’s daily operations. However, it sits on a section of track connecting the excursion route with OCSR’s main restoration facility. Until the bridge is repaired or rebuilt, all equipment moving between the two sites will need to be transported by truck. 

As this story went to press, the railroad was seeking the help of a bridge inspector to determine if the structure was a total loss and whether it would need to be rebuilt from the ground up. The local sheriff’s office is currently investigating the cause of the blaze, and the railroad has been in contact with state and federal law enforcement agencies since the railroad is federally regulated, making a targeted act a federal crime. 

This is the second excursion railroad in the Pacific Northwest to be affected by a bridge fire this year. In late April, a bridge on the Mount Rainier Scenic was also destroyed by fire. The cause of that fire is still under investigation. 

—Justin Franz 

The post Oregon Coast Scenic Bridge Damaged in Fire appeared first on Railfan & Railroad Magazine.

New York, Susquehanna, & Western SY 2-8-2 142 has returned to service at the Belvidere & Delaware River Railway in New Jersey. The locomotive is owned by the New York, Susquehanna, & Western Technical Historical Society and was last used on regular excursions in 2017, when it was taken out of service for an overhaul. 

Since then, crews have slowly but surely rebuilt the locomotive, firing it up for the first time in seven years in 2024. The engine returned to service in late September and will be leading Delaware River Railroad Excursions throughout October. 

NYS&W 142 is one of a half-dozen Chinese steam locomotives exported to the United States. It was built in 1989 for Connecticut’s Valley Railroad, where it ran into the 1990s. The Susquehanna purchased its own SY locomotive, but it was lost at sea when the ship it was on sank. The NYS&W then purchased the Valley locomotive (then numbered 1647) and gave it the number 142, two numbers above the last Susquehanna 2-8-2 (140) and one number above the one that sank (141). It ran in excursion service on the railroad for more than a decade before being sold to the historical society. 

The other Chinese-built steam locomotives in the U.S. include Valley Railroad SY 2-8-2 3025 (built for the Knox & Kane in 1989), JS 2-8-2 8419 at the Boone & Scenic, Iowa Interstate QJ 2-10-2s 6988 and 7081, and R.J. Corman QJ 2-10-2 2008 (now owned by Kentucky Steam Heritage Corp.). 

The post NYS&W 142 Returns to Service appeared first on Railfan & Railroad Magazine.